|
Ninth [Short] Circuit Disconnect from
Natural Law.
When you read what follows, keep in mind this one point: when you
depart from natural law, you haven't gotten anywhere…
Apparently, the ninth circuit court has not kept this in mind, nor are they
dimly aware of the consequences of attempting to flout natural law the way they
have with their latest position, an insane position that they've taken about
self-defense being only a
collective right. That's right! "Insane" is the operative word, here, and I
will conceptually connect the term "sanity" with the term "natural law" to
expose the reality of the ninth circuit's collective mental illness which
precludes a basic understanding of individual rights and which has them flying
in the face of the American Way.
First, the dictionary definition of sanity: the quality or state of being sane;
especially : soundness or health of mind.
Now, my definition of sanity - is that an individual is using enough of their
mental potential so that they are connecting observable reality with
properly-formed and interconnected abstractions in consciousness (which manifest
on a conscious level as clear thought) so that the individual is in tune with
natural law. This attunement with natural law maximizes mind/body coordination
on both microcosmic, organic levels as well as macroscopic spiritual levels.
More simply, sanity is the degree to which the individual is in tune with
natural law, which is determined by the fineness and balance of that
individual's overall mind/body coordination. It is the sharpness of and balance
between heart and head which rules perception and conception.
Could this possibly explain why the ninth circuit court has missed the
connection between individual
rights, specifically the individual rights to life, liberty and the pursuit
of happiness - and the means to preserve that life? I mean, how do they "square"
individual rights as defined in the Declaration of Independence and the rest of
the Bill of Rights, which so clearly expound on individual inalienable rights -
with their ruling that individuals possess no right to keep and bear arms? Could
it be that the individuals that comprise the ninth circuit court - are insane?
I submit that the ninth circuit court buys into that form of government we shall
refer to here as collectivism (a.k.a. "mob rule") which tramples individual
inalienable rights. That is, the judges on the ninth circuit court are
collectivists, who see their judicial "solutions" only in terms of the
collective, not actually on the level of individual rights. Well, the
NAZIs operated on the
basis of public or collective "health" too, in the same manner these judges on
the ninth circuit court have ruled that the right to keep and bear arms is only
a collective right "owned" by the state, which they believe should maintain a
monopoly on the use of force. Their ruling makes the state supreme, not the
individual and it turns our form of jurisprudence on it's head.
I submit that there are only two ways to perceive these ninth circuit court
judges. Either they are mentally ill, or they are domestic enemies who conspire
to undermine our form of government. Of course, that the megalomaniacal ARE
mentally ill, there can be no doubt. What I'm suggesting, however, is that they
are opposed to the American way and are working for and toward another form of
government, that being a collectivist one. That is, they are denying you your
individual rights.
Clearly, they are socialists and traitors to the United States of America -
unless they are willing to concede that they are mentally unbalanced, that they
are out of tune with natural law and that they are incompetent to sit on the
bench where the clear thinking of the sane must prevail. Western civilization
DEPENDS on this issue being resolved. (Of course, collectivism IS a symptom of
mental illness,
but I believe that in this case it's more of a conscious choice than the
manifestation of disease.)
For the longest time, the ninth circuit court has "loosed" their decisions on
the United States, the highest peak of western civilization yet known to the
world. The ninth circuit's consistent flouting of Constitutional rule of law
which constitutes an attempt to flout NATURAL law - reveals malice. The truly
insane are not consistent, since they are divorced from reality and their
personal constitution with regard to natural law is by organic fiat. That is, as
their brain chemistry changes from nutrition, drugs and so forth, they will
experience variable mental states which should therefore yield variable
approaches to dealing with reality. Not so with the ninth circuit court. They
are consistent in their malice towards the western values documented in our
founder's writings. So, I must once again submit that these leftist judicial
activists are carrying out conscious subversion and they should be charged
accordingly. (In my view they're not insane, they're criminals! At least,
they're lobbying for criminals - by disarming law-abiding citizens who then
become future victims...)
The whole basis of Western civilization is that the individual, free from the
constraints of over-burgeoning government - can create, he can forge a higher
standard of living (note that key word, "living"…), he can make a better world
for himself and his progeny by harnessing (operating in tune with)
natural law in such a way
as to raise he and his family above the mean, crawling things of the earth -
without doing harm, without violating the rights of others. The ninth circuit
court, however, disagrees with this view that man should be able to protect his
family and himself from those who DO NOT understand the premise of Western
civilization, those who are intent on doing harm. They (the ninth circuit
judges) disagree with natural law which says, "I, as an individual have
inalienable rights, one of which includes the right to defend that life". They
disagree with the natural laws which even govern our own bodies, namely those
natural forces which constitute an immune-system which protects us from
organisms that would do us harm on a cellular level.
The ninth circuit court - is not a friend of western civilization. In fact, they
are undermining it wholesale, with forethought and malice. Specifically, they
are in DIRECT OPPOSITION to the founding principles of the United States, they
are opposed to Constitutional rule of law which states that individuals DO have
inalienable rights like the right to self-defense, the right to keep and BEAR
arms! The ninth circuit court is destroying the "immune system" of this country
by declaring that the "individual cells" (individuals) in this country - do not
have the right of self-defense. This is clearly a case of the "mind" (the ninth
circuit) being at odds with the "body" (us), to use a transdisciplinary
"holographic" model. This would be the definition of insanity, except that it is
being done by a conscious mindset that is alien to Western civilization. Call it
an invasion by the brain-snatchers, if you want to abuse that old title… In any
case, it is fiat rule of law, not American Constitutional rule of law.
Therefore, I must submit that we have a domestic enemy among us. Whether they
are infiltrators from the third world who have sprung up among us via adoption
of alien views or whether they're simple mental dysfunctionals who are ruled by
the fiat dictates of their diseased brains which have observable trouble
apprehending natural law - those principles which promote life - these ninth
circuit court judges must be removed. I am hoping that mere exposure will stop
their uncivilized, third-world, anti-American rantings which are subverting my
country. After that, there are few alternatives.
Frederick P. Blume Jr. 12/12/2002
Permission to repost the article immediately above is granted
under the condition that you repost it in it's entirety.
|